Sweclockers, on the other hand, used the king of all gaming CPUs: the Core i7-8700k. PCGamesN was using a Ryzen 2700X while Hardwareluxx used an AMD Threadripper 1950X processor - which is decidedly not clocked for gaming purposes. See, PCGamesN and Hardwareluxx were both using processors less powerful than the one used by Sweclockers. This is what makes me believe that the reason for these vast differences actually has much to do with the CPU used. Intel leads Battlefield V Closed Alpha CPU charts which indicate a CPU bottleneck at play Considering both the GTX 1080 Ti and RX Vega 64 have the bandwidth to spare, this seems to be an issue with the CPU side of things. See at "low" settings, if your positioning is changing then it either has to do with memory bandwidth (textures) or with the CPU not being able to process optimally. Hardwareluxx also found out that at low settings, the NVIDIA GTX 1080 Ti manages to take the top crown once again and this is I believe one of the telling signs of the discrepancy. Image credits: Hardwareluxx & Sweclockers These benchmarks are however limited to the middle-end spectrum only, with the likes of the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 pit against the AMD RX 580. The reason these results raise eyebrows is because NVIDIA offerings have typically enjoyed a lead over their red counterparts (with the downside of a higher premium) and it looks like Battlefield V evens the playing field a little. In these we see AMD graphics cards taking a very clear lead against their NVIDIA counterparts and it begs the question whether game-specific optimizations are at play here. Let's start with the benchmarks that sparked the entire controversy, which come from our friends over at PCGamesN. Battlefield V (Closed Alpha) benchmarks: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Ti and AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 battle for the top spot The same goes for all of the NVIDIA and AMD lineup and this is something pretty interesting considering there is a wide performance gap between the GeForce GTX 1080 Ti and the RX Vega 64 - with the latter usually behind the former. Move your cursor over the value to see individual results.Closed alpha benchmarks of Battlefield V have been popping up and show the NVIDIA GTX 1080 Ti trading blows with the AMD RX Vega 64 depending on the quality settings and resolution. The value in the fields displays the average frame rate of all values in the database. Uncertain – This graphics card has not been explicitly tested on this game and no reliable interpolation can be made based on the performances of surrounding cards of the same class or family. A slower card may be able to achieve better and more consistent frame rates than this particular GPU running the same benchmark scene. Uncertain – This graphics card experienced unexpected performance issues during testing for this game. Based on interpolated information from surrounding graphics cards of similar performance levels, fluent frame rates are expected. May Run Fluently – This graphics card has not been explicitly tested on this game. Based on interpolated information from surrounding graphics cards of similar performance levels, stutters and poor frame rates are expected.įluent – Based on all known benchmarks using the specified graphical settings, this game should run at or above 25fpsįluent – Based on all known benchmarks using the specified graphical settings, this game should run at or above 35fpsįluent – Based on all known benchmarks using the specified graphical settings, this game should run at or above 58fps May Stutter – This graphics card has not been explicitly tested on this game. Based on all known benchmarks using the specified graphical settings, average frame rates are expected to fall below 25fps Stutters – This game is very likely to stutter and have poor frame rates. n123 Number of benchmarks for this median value / * Approximate position
0 kommentar(er)
